Darren Bernhardt · CBC News · Posted: Nov 22, 2021 1:12 PM CT | Last Updated: November 22
Disclaimer – The views in this article are not necessarily the views of, nor express our reality in, ASPA. The purpose of highlighting this article is to provide members with varying viewpoints and information about Labour and the happenings around campus, provincially, nationally and internationally.
Administration accepts recommendation but union eyes counter-proposal.
The mediator trying to find a middle ground in the three-week-long University of Manitoba faculty strike has hit an impasse and is recommending binding arbitration to resolve the dispute.
Arne Peltz advised the two sides this weekend that he believes there is no likelihood they will reach a settlement without a protracted strike continuing.
As such, binding arbitration — in which a decision is legally binding and enforceable, similar to a court order — is the best path forward to an agreement, he suggested.
The U of M put out a news release on Monday saying it accepts the recommendation.
The University of Manitoba Faculty Association, for its part, doesn’t tend to agree.
In an email to CBC News attributed to president Orvie Dingwall, the union said it is reviewing the proposal and “will make a counter-proposal regarding the specifics of an arbitration.”
UMFA, which represents over 1,200 professors, instructors and librarians at the Winnipeg-based university, went on strike Nov. 2.
The association is seeking higher salaries for its members, arguing that persistently low pay is causing retention and recruitment problems. The U of M ranks second to last out of the 15 research-based institutions in terms of salary.
The union has also cited government interference in the bargaining process as preventing successful negotiations with university administration.
Last week, UMFA tabled an offer to the university’s administration the union says would have addressed the issue of retention and recruitment of UMFA members and could have ended the strike, but the administration chose to reject it or to make a counter-offer.
“In addition to addressing the administration’s unwillingness to present a realistic offer to UMFA members, the two sides have not yet agreed on issues relating to working conditions,” Dingwall said in the release from UMFA.
“Specifically, the administration continues to refuse language that allows faculty to take their full vacation and refuses to accept language that would prevent the administration from forcing members to teach their classes online in non-pandemic times.
“UMFA strongly believes that these outstanding issues must be addressed before the association could agree to binding arbitration to address financial compensation. UMFA will inform the university of these outstanding conditions as a pre-condition before any discussions of binding arbitration would begin.”